Scott Conlon

Expand Your Mind!

Google vs Facebook - Are you Kidding Me?

Time and time again you hear comments like will Google survive Facebook?  Is Facebook the web phenomenon that has Google beat?  Are you kidding me?  I give Facebook and Mark Zuckerburg plenty of credit for leading the social media world; however, stop putting them up against companies like Google.  A leader in internet search, a leader in internet advertising, a leader in mobile devices and a leader in technology. 

Facebook, with about 600 million registered users or profiles, is an amazing success, but they are still far behind Google.  When you have Google Search, Google Adsense, Google Voice, Youtube, Android, Doubleclick, Google Analytics, Google Earth, Tallest building in Dublin (Happy St Patrick’s Day) and even Google Energy, will you really put that up against Facebook?

By no means am I saying Facebook is out or will even drop like MySpace did.  Facebook did what Google did and integrated themselves all over the internet so that wherever you go, there is Facebook.  Facebook changed the landsape of the internet, but Google still capitalizes on that. 

Google has not only improved their search engine and the way you connect to it, but also their ad network.  Google’s gold mind, Google Adsense, which displays contextual and visual ads all over the internet including mobile devices, will still be untouched.  If anything, by Facebook bringing more businesses online, they have been able to bring more advertising dollars to the internet, not just for themselves, but for all internet companies including Google.

Time will tell, but for now…I am tired of hearing Google be put up against Facebook.

Share/Save/Bookmark

What will the Stock Market do in 2010?

Many speculators and bearish investors continue to say the stock market is overvalued or has had too long of a run up to continue through 2010.  Many of these investors also believe the free money flooded into the economy by the government will soon put a drag on equities which will drive down stocks.  These bears of the market have been missing out on one of the greatest bull markets seen in decades.  This past week we have seen several bad reports showing the sluggish job market and housing market continuing to take a toll on the US economy but the market still sustained and continued to climb higher…to its 15 month highs.  So why is the market back to the levels of October 2008; shortly after the September 2008 stock market crash?  The market is not overvalued.  The reason is simple…companies are making money. 

With 4th Quarter earnings starting next week, we will begin to see why the market has outperformed the way it has.  Of course we will still see low earnings from companies such as home builders and some retailers but we will see some great results from the technology sector, energy and basic materials.

The mobile technology boom including smart phones, laptops and netbooks is the main driving force for technology in 2009 and 2010.  The international growth that is seen in countries such as Australia, China, and Norway help drive the basic materials market.  These countries continue to increase demand in steel, coal, iron and other materials.

2010 will continue to be a bull market.  What will the Stock Market do in 2010?  My projection…continue its upward trend 40% for the year.

My 2010 Stock Picks and their current prices:

BUCY $67.28

AMD $9.43

RTP $237.20

GIS $70.20

LINE $20.00

BAC $16.78

WFC $28.86

CREE $59.37

MTB $73.84

AAPL $211.98

Be bullish in 2010.  The Equity market is not overvalued…companies are making money and so should you!

Share/Save/Bookmark

Bucyrus International Stock, Is Bucyrus International a Good Stock to Buy.

On October 10th, 2009 I stated on Facebook that this stock was up about 40% in 5 months and that this stock still had room to grow.  Well, grow it did!  Now Bucyrus International, Inc (BUCY) has been up over 100%.  We still expect the stock market to have some pull back but keep an eye on this stock.  BUCY still has plenty of room to grow.  With the stock around the $52 a share range, it still appears to be a great buy.  Bucyrus International is a company that manufactures mining equipment with facilities in Australia, China, Germany, Poland and the United States.  The growth in China and the recovery seen in Australia are going to continue to push this stock higher.  The building of infastructure is going to continue to grow especially as the global economy recovers from this recession.

Keep an eye on the BUCY stock as it continues to be one of the great plays on the recovery.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Credit Card Reform to be Passed into Law by President Obama

Today the House passes a new bill that will bring reform to the credit card industry. The new Credit Card Reform bill, set to be signed into law by President Obama before Memorial Day, will have a huge impact on the credit industry. The bill, written by Banking Committee Chairman Christoper Dodd (D-Conn.), was passed by the Senate on Tuesday.

Senator Dodd stated, “Many Americans depend on credit cards to get by in this economy, and today they have won a giant victory that ensures they are protected from practices that would drive them further into debt, while also making our economy stronger.”

The new Credit Card Reform Bill will prohibit credit card companies from increasing rates on existing balances unless the borrow is at least 60 days delinquent. Then if the borrow pays ontime for the next 6 months, the interest rate will be restored to its original rate. On cards with more than one interest rate, such as interest on new purchases and a different interest rate on balance transfers, payments will apply to the debts with higher rates.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Tuesday said the bill “will help create a more fair, transparent and simple consumer credit market.”

However, Credit Card executives said it will have an immense impact on how credit card companies do business and will force them to charge higher interest rates and annual fees to both delinquent customers and those in good standing.

“This bill fundamentally changes the entire business model of credit cards by restricting the ability to price credit for risk,” said Edward L. Yingling, the chief executive of the American Bankers Association. He stated that it would make lending even more risky and that, “It is a fundamental rule of lending that an increase in risk means that less credit will be available and that the credit that is available will often have a higher interest rate.

When credit cards were introduced about 50 years ago, there was a one-size-fits-all approach where interest rates and fees were roughly the same rate for everyone. The common rate was about 18%. The industry became deregulated in the 1980s which was around the time the credit score system was introduced. Now credit card issuers were capable of determining which customers were a higher risk and which were not so risky.

One of the major revenue sources for the credit card industry is that of interest and fees associated with customers that do not pay their bills off in full each month. With this loss of revenue, credit card companies will have to turn to the lower risk customers who once benefited from lower interest credit and rewards programs. Annual fees will likely return to rewards programs such as frequent flyer miles and cash back rewards. Interest rates will likely rise across the board for all credit card customers and 0% transfers will likely be non-existant. The new legislation still allows issuers to increase interest rates for future purchases as long as they give a 45 day notice.

This morning when I checked my mail, I received a letter from CapitalOne. At first I tought it was another offer for low balance transfers or to join one of their affiliates, but to my suprise it was a statement of change of Terms of Use. The interest rate on my credit card had been increased. I had heard discussions in the news that Obama’s administration has been pushing for Credit Card Reform, but it was not until today that I really began to understand what this means for us.

As someone who has experience with both paying off credit cards in full each month and also making minimum payments while carrying over balances, I am very skeptic of this new Credit Card Reform bill that will soon be passed by President Obama. I think it is imperative for credit card companies to be able to determine which borrowers are higher risk and charge higher interests on those that are of more risk. Higher interest rates help discourage borrowers from spending money on products they do not need or cannot afford. So as someone begins to carry higher balances and more debt, credit card companies will increase those rates. Not necessarily to discourage those from spending more but also to help secure their credit. It is just like auto insurance. If someone has more tickets or more accidents on their record, they are a higher risk to the insurance company that is insuring them. If someone has an accident, then their rates should be increased on that auto policy. Otherwise the auto insurance industry will have to raise rates on all of their policy holders in order to still be profitable.

Government regulations on businesses such as this Credit Card Reform have many negative impacts. Businesses want to succeed and be profitable. Companies also need to be competitive and therefore will offer such programs as cash back rewards or increase wages for their employees. By regulating businesses and causing them to change business rules and practices, you will ultimately have negative impacts on the economy as well. Obama wants to free up the credit market and help small businesses gain more access to credit; however, he forces credit card companies to raise interest rates across the board to “stabilize” the economy. Lower profits for credit card companies may also turn into job losses in the near future. I sure hope this new reform bill turns out better than I am picturing i will.

What do you think?

Share/Save/Bookmark

Vodafone HTC Magic with Android, the next T-Mobile G2?

HTC recently announced their plans for the Smart Phones of 2009.  which will include atleast 3 smart phones with Android operating system.  In February the HTC Magic was the 2nd Google phone to hit the market which some are referring it to the G2 Phone.  The handset is currently being sold in Europe by Vodafone.

Will the new HTC Magic be the T-Mobile G2 phone available here in the United States? Nothing has been announced yet regarding plans to release this phone to US carriers but many speculate that T-Mobile is picking this phone up as their successor to the T-Mobile G1. In October 2008 T-Mobile starting selling the first phone to run on the Android operating system, the HTC Dream, which T-Mobile branded as the G1.

Although not all the details have been released about the new HTC Magic but the phone has some similarities but many differences to the G1 phone. Like the G1, the Magic will run with the open source Android Operating System and use Bluetooth, WiFi and GPS technologies. Instead of a keyboard like the G1 has, the Magic will only have an onscreen touch keyboard. The phone will include a video functionality where the G1 only had a still camera capability. The new HTC Magic will also have a sleeker design with a glossy finish rather than the matte finish. A new useful feature will be in the Gmail application that provides multi selecting of emails similar to how Gmail on a web browser operates. The G1 Phone or HTC Dream only allows for deleting or selecting options one email at a time.

The next several months will be exciting for the smart phone industry. Will the new HTC Magic be the next T-Mobile G2? When will HTC release their new smart phones to the US market? As the leader in phones also carrying the Microsoft Windows Mobile OS, HTC is taking charge of the Android market as well.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Cell Phone Only Households Becoming the Norm

Remember watching on TV and seeing these huge funky phones? Not only were they huge and heavy, they were extremely expensive. In the early 1990s only about 1 % of the population had a “cellular phone”, remember they were not called cell phones at that time. Well in 2005 about 51% of Americans were carrying a cell phone.

Without suprise a new study about cell phones has hit the news. This time it is not about how many people are using cell phones, it is about how many people are not using home land line phones. It appears that having Cell-Phone only households is becoming the norm in today’s society. But this does not come to us as a surprise.

If you still own a home phone line, how often do you use it? Do you notice yourself always putting down your cell phone number now whenever filling out forms requiring a contact number? With all the unlimited plans, the high minute usage plans, the family plans and Add-a-Line plans available, who would need a land line?

Since it does not suprise you that the number of cell phone only households is on the rise, do you know which state has the highest cell phone only population? Do you think that a state which had more people on the go, a younger population or the most single living people would be on the top of that list? According to a recent study, Oklahoma and Utah have the highest percentage of Cell Phone Only Households. Oklahome has a whopping 26.2% with Utah closely trailing at 25.5%. That is 1 out of 4 people in these states have only a cell phone line and do not have a home land line. As we see more unlimited plans and more people switching to include data plans, I think this number will continue to grow. Out of the 3 other people that have home lines, I wonder how many of those still have long distance charges or if they use services such as Skype or Vonage VOIP phone service.

To see where your state ranks in the list of Cell Phone Only Households check it out on FoxNews.com.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Foreclosure Bailout & Housing Recovery with Obama’s Stimulus Package

The rate of foreclosures decreased by about 10% in January 2009 from the prior month, December 2008. The rate of foreclosures is still up almost 18% from January 2007. So what is President Obama and Congress doing to recover the housing market and slow down the foreclosures? The recently passed legislatures is supposed to do just that.

President Barack Obama announced a $75 billion plan to lower monthly mortgage payments and keep up to four million distressed homeowners in their homes. How exactly will this plan help in the housing recovery? Is this new legislature just another bailout plan? Who will be affected by a foreclosure bailout? How do I benefit from Obama’s Stimulus Plan if I do not yet own a home?

There are two main focuses on the recovery of the real estate market. The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, also known as the Making Home Affordable program, is aimed to assist more than 9 million people with nearly 6 million homes that are either in or at-risk for foreclosure, a record high. The stability plan will allot $75 Billion to aid homeowners that are in distress with paying their mortgages. The money is being used to renegotiated mortgages (Home Affordable Modification Program) to help lower payments and keep residents in their homes as well as help refinance homeowners’ mortgages (Home Affordable Refinance Program) to a lower interest rate who have not been able to do so due to the value of their homes decreasing dramatically. The idea is that homeowners should not have a mortgage note that costs more than 31% of their income. Through the Home Affordable Refinance Program, refinancing aid is available for four to five million homeowners who receive their mortgages through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and who have a solid payment history. The Home Affordable Modification Program aimed at helping those that have been struggling to pay their mortgage through no fault of their own. This includes homeowners that have recently had a change in circumstances that causes financial hardship or is facing a recent or imminent increase in the payment that will burden financial hardship. To learn more about the “Making Home Affordable” Program visit FinancialStability.gov.

So what if you have been paying your mortgage and are not at risk of foreclosure? Many people have raised concerns that this plan is bailing out people that have made bad decisions in buying a home and feel that it is not fair to help those that are unable to pay for their homes. Obama has made statements that this plan is to help everyone in this struggling economy. If you own a home and your neighbors home is foreclosed, that lowers the value of your home. As Obama stated, neighborhoods are struggling as home values have been dropping due to the number of foreclosures. This stability plan will help reduce the number of foreclosures thus saving the value of many Americans’ homes.

For those that have been thinking about buying their first home but have been hesitant due to the current state of the economy, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 has provided a great incentive to do so. Under the new tax provisions recently signed into law, a new home buyer that purchases their home after January 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2009 will benefit from the new tax break. Under this new Refundable First-time Home Buyer Credit, if you purchase a home during this period you may be eligible for a credit of $8,000. Previously the First-time Home Buyer Credit of up to $7,500 was a no interest loan that needed to be paid back over the course of 15 years, but now the credit does not require the funds to be paid back and acts solely as a one time credit on either your 2008 or 2009 tax returns. If you are looking to purchase your first home during this time you can learn more about the Refundable First-time Home Buyer Credit on the irs.gov website.

So no matter what your circumstance is regarding the housing market, it is important to know that it affects us all and if needed, there may be help or benefits out there for you. Whether these new legislatures will indeed impact the real estate crisis or not, only time will tell.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Making Work Pay Tax Credit in Obama’s Stimulus Package

Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was passed into law on February 17, 2009, much speculation has risen about whether or not the 2009 stimulus package will work on recovering the US economy. Since Barack Obama began putting together plans to stimulate the economy and create more jobs, critics have been taking sides. Those that have not shown support have been calling his stimulus package a Spendulus Package or have been joking about how much $13 a week would really help struggling Americans.

Where did the talk about $13 a week come from? The recent new American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, that was signed into law, includes new tax provisions. The “Making Work Pay Tax Credit” of this new bill will provide a refundable tax credit of up to $400 for working individuals and $800 for married taxpayers filing joint returns. Starting no later than April 1, 2009 you should begin to see a credit of $13 a week in your paycheck. This will last until 2010 when it will be changed to $8 a week until the $400 is reached.

Will this “Making Work Pay Tax Credit” really help stimulate the economy. Many people have been mocking the bill saying ‘What is someone going to do with an extra $13 a week?’ There is much speculation that this will have very little stimulation on the economy and that it will take too long to make a difference in the job market.

The Making Work Pay tax credit is only part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Other tax provisions such as the Refundable First-time Home Buyer Credit, Money Back for New Vehicle Purchases and the Economic Recovery Payment are all part of the new bill.

For More Details on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009:
Recovery.gov
Tax Provisions
First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

Share/Save/Bookmark

Is the T-Mobile G1 with Google’s Android Worth the Buy?

So I was a little late to getting on board with the Tmobile G1 phone with Google’s Android operating system. But I finally ended up getting it. Was I disappointed? Was it worth buying the Tmobile G1 phone?

In case you are not familiar with what the G1 and Android are, I figured I would tell you a little about it. Google was one of the founding members of the Open Handset Alliance, which is a group of companies including mobile handset makers, application developers, some mobile carriers and chip makers. The role of the Open Handset Alliance (OHA) is to develop the standards for mobile devices. One of the standards already developed by the OHA is Android, the open source operating system for mobile phones.

Android is open source which allows developers to tap into the software to customize the operating system and to develop applications that make use of the operating system functions. There are many features of Android that really make it a powerful piece of software. Google provides an Android Software Development Kit which provides the necessary tools and standard APIs to develop applications for the Android operating system. One of the most powerful features of Android is the complete multitasking environment it possesses. This means the operating system can run multiple applications in parrallel and any applications in the background an draw attention to itself by producing notifications. Applications on Android can also embed web content. HTML, javascript and style sheets can be embedded through the WebView on Android. Many other features help make Android one of the most powerful operating systems on the mobile devices.

So what does this have to do with the T-Mobile G1 phone? Well the G1 was the first and currently the only phone with the Android operating system on the market. Was buying the Tmobile G1 phone worth it?

The phone has a touch screen similar to that of the iPhone and many other smart phones currently available. It does not have multi-touch like the iPhone but it does have a built in QWERTY keyboard that can be used simply by sliding the screen open. There are not as many applications available as the iPhone but since the Android phone will eventually be on more phones with more carriers, Android apps will eventually out score the availabilty of iPhone apps. I would say the largest problem with the T-Mobile G1 phone is the battery life. The phone for me sometimes does not even last the whole day. This is overcourse with use of applications, talk time and texting. Since you can charge the phone with a wall jack, USB port or car charger, you usually can keep it charged. There are applications you can also install that help you with power management so that you do not drain the battery really fast.

Other than the poor batter life on the phone, I would have to say the Tmobile G1 was worth the buy. Since I was able to renew my contract with Tmobile when buying the phone I saved $200. It only cost me $179. I mostly wanted to get the phone so I can begin learning the development process in building applications for the Android operating system. So I will write blog entries in the future to let you know what I think about developing for Android and how those applications work with my T-Mobile G1 phone.

If you also have the G1 phone or have used it, then let us know what you think about it and what applications you find useful or fun.

Share/Save/Bookmark

U.S. House of Representatives Passes Auto Bailout Vote

Despite the opposition from the majority of Senate Republicans, the Democrats and the Bush White House have pushed for a $14 Billion bailout of the big 3 auto makers in the US. The emergency loan program will require the auto makers to restructure their businesses and become viable in the auto industry. One of the big concerns by many that are opposing the bill feel that the restructuring plans should be in place before the loan is given rather than quickly providing the loan and allowing several months before a restructure plan must be presented.

The government is on a spending spree and the Bush administration continues to drift further from the conservative ideals he once held. I understand the repercussions that could occur from not bailing out the auto industry but our country will not gain strength in the global economy if we continue to produce products that are not competitive on the global market. We need to focus on production that will increase our export goods. Investing more money on alternative energy sources, medicine, technology, machinery and innovation will be more beneficial than attempting to keep afloat businesses that have not been successful in the global economy.

I have mixed feelings about whether we should bail out the auto makers. I really do not think we should be bailing out businesses especially those that will take a long time to be viable and will require much more than the initial investment. On the other hand our economy does need a break to have a chance to recover before taking another big hit. Maybe putting the inevitable on hold will give our economy time to prepare for an end to our nations auto manufacturing.

The auto maker bailout has not yet been passed through the Senate. I do not think it will pass this time around but in the end will make it into legislature. Only time will tell. I am just thankful to be a young investor during these times of hardship.

Share/Save/Bookmark